An evaluation is only as good as the data behind it. Learn what makes a trustworthy golden set, how to write test cases by hand, how to mine production logs into test sets, and how to keep a dataset covered, sliced, and clean — then build Docent's golden dataset.
Welcome to Building Eval Datasets, the second module. Every metric you’ll learn in this course scores an output against an example, which means your evaluation is only ever as good as the dataset behind it. A biased, thin, or leaky dataset produces confident numbers that mean nothing. This module makes your dataset something you can trust.
You’ll learn what separates a real golden set from a handful of cherry-picked questions — representativeness, labeled references, diversity, and hard cases held out on purpose. You’ll write test cases by hand with structured references and tags, then learn to mine production logs into fresh test cases so your dataset tracks real usage. You’ll measure coverage and slices to find the blind spots a single average hides, and practice the hygiene — versioning, deduplication, no leakage — that keeps a dataset honest over time. The guided project assembles Docent’s golden dataset: versioned, tagged, covered, and ready to drive every metric in the modules that follow.
Start with Lesson 1, where you’ll learn what actually makes an evaluation dataset trustworthy.
Complete all 5 lessons to finish the Building Eval Datasets module.